Pope Francis: Being ‘properly informed’ on COVID-19 vaccines is a ‘human right’

[Nube]

By Courtney Mares, Vatican City, Jan 28, 2022 / 07:00 am


Pope Francis addresses members of the Catholic Factchecking consortium at the Vatican’s Clementine Hall, Jan. 28, 2022 | Vatican Media.

Pope Francis said on Friday that it is a human right to be “properly informed” with scientific data, rather than “fake news,” in a meeting with a Catholic fact-checking group focused on COVID-19 vaccines.

“To be properly informed, to be helped to understand situations based on scientific data and not fake news, is a human right,” Pope Francis said on Jan. 28.

The pope met with the International Catholic Media Consortium on COVID-19 Vaccines, which runs the website catholic-factchecking.com.

“We can hardly fail to see that these days, in addition to the pandemic, an ‘infodemic’ is spreading: a distortion of reality based on fear, which in our global society leads to an explosion of commentary on falsified if not invented news,” the pope said.

“Contributing, often unwittingly, to this climate is the sheer volume of allegedly ‘scientific’ information, comments and opinions, which ends up causing confusion for the reader or listener.”

The consortium includes Aleteia, I.Media, Verificat, and Our Sunday Visitor. It receives scientific consulting from the Barcelona-based Institute for Global Health. The group was awarded a grant in 2021 from the $3 million COVID-19 Vaccine Counter-Misinformation Open Fund sponsored by the Google News Initiative.

In a Jan. 20 post, Aleteia responded to reports about the project’s funding sources, saying that allegations that Aleteia had ties to George Soros or Bill Gates were “unfounded.”

(...)

Source:
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news ... uman-right

[Nube]

On this issue I would like to say that Fact-checking (as the organization of groups dedicated to declare what is true and what is false) is not and never will be Catholic, but is contrary to Christian morality. It is a mistake to call it Catholic when it is not.

As we expressed in this article*, fact-checking emerged from one moment to another as a strategy of Freemasonry in the media, and is linked to conspiracies (which obviously exist and great examples of them can be read in the Bible).

Moreover, fact-checking pretends to replace the personal discernment that must be exercised during the personal life of each human being, by a direction based on blind trust to supposed experts.

In relation to Covid vaccines we have seen that these "verification sites" (misleaders is what they should be called ) have declared news as fake-news simply because it was claimed that the vaccines contained something that the manufacturers had not declared in their labels, and therefore if the manufacturer did not declare it, it was fake-news, as if somehow anti-Christian pharmaceuticals enjoyed a certain prerogative so that everything they said was considered to be true.

As we have stated, fact-checking has the medium-term objective of contributing to the censorship of truthful information while at the same time facilitating false narratives and their dissemination, and aims to give them a halo of credibility and "indisputable or approved knowledge", against which it would not be possible to assert anything to the contrary. For these reasons it is anti-Christian and must be fought by the Christians of the world as coming from the Devil.

(*) Article in which we already expressed that the purpose of fact-checking was to "take possession" of the truth in order to spread the lie officially and to try to cancel the personal discernment to which we as Christians are called. It can be accessed at this link:
http://www.deunanube.com/on-the-existen ... spiracies/

Sobre esta cuestión me permito opinar que el Fact-checking (entendido como la organización de grupos dedicados a anunciar lo que es verdadero y lo que es falso) no es y nunca será católico, sino que es contrario a la moral cristiana. Es un error llamarlo católico cuando no lo es.

Como expresamos en este artículo*, el fact-checking surgió de un momento a otro como una estrategia de la masonería en los medios de comunicación, y está ligado a conspiraciones (las cuales obviamente, no solo existen sino que grandes ejemplos de ellas están en la Biblia).

Además el fact-checking pretende reemplazar el discernimiento personal que debe ejercerse durante la vida personal de cada ser humano, por un direccionamiento basado en una confianza ciega a supuestos expertos.

En relación a las vacunas por Covid, hemos visto que estos sitios verificadores (engañadores es como habría que llamarlos ) han declarado noticias como fake-news simplemente porque se afirmaba que las vacunas contenían algo que los fabricantes no habían declarado en sus prospectos, y por ende si el fabricante no lo declaró era fake-news, como si de algún modo las farmacéuticas anticristianas gozaran de cierta prerrogativa para que todo lo que digan se considere cierto.

Como hemos afirmado, el fact-checking tiene como objetivo a mediano plazo el contribuir a la censura de informaciones verídicas al tiempo que facilita la narrativa falsa, su difusión y pretende darle un halo de credibilidad y de conocimiento indiscutible o aprobado, contra el que no se podría afirmar luego algo contrario. Por estos motivos es anti-cristiano y debe ser combatido por los cristianos del mundo como algo que es proveniente de Satanás.

(*) Artículo en el que ya expresabamos que el fact-checking tenía por objeto adueñarse de la verdad para difundir la mentira oficialmente y pretender anular el discernimiento personal al que estamos llamados los cristianos. Puede accederse en este link:
http://www.deunanube.com/sobre-la-exist ... iraciones/

[mdc]

Si estar debidamente informados sobre las vacunas es un derecho humano, entonces cómo es que se está imponiendo la vacunación bajo amenazas, con sustancias que solo conocen las farmacéuticas, porque no informan al público oficialmente acerca del contenido de los viales?

Y esto mismo está haciendo el Vaticano, al exigir la vacunación "sin saberse" qué contenido tienen las vacunas (aparte de las observaciones de expertos en diversas partes del mundo, que por otra parte confirman encontrar tóxicos peligrosos y letales, además de micro-tecnología que la Iglesia no podría aprobar sin comisiones bioeticas que estudien al respecto).

¿Estará insinuando que él mismo viola derechos humanos al mandar exigir vacunaciones con contenidos secretos?

Repasemos la cuestión de la Prudencia.. esto que es (era?) una virtud, ya que como indica la razón, el que una vacuna sea buena o mala no está determinado por la vacuna en si misma que solo es un medio, sino por cuál es el contenido de esa vacuna. Ergo, si el contenido es secreto, es imprudente defender incondicionalmente una vacuna, sea cual sea.

Sean prudentes y no se vacunen, hay suficientes indicios (y profecías previas a la pandemia que lo mencionan expresamente) que aconsejan en contrario. Sean prudentes y no se vacunen mas...